Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for BreadcrumbList scheme #12

Open
mallardduck opened this issue Oct 12, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Add support for BreadcrumbList scheme #12

mallardduck opened this issue Oct 12, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@mallardduck
Copy link

Supporting the BreadcrumbList scheme can be a useful feature as it helps google add a list of breadcrumb links under search results!

As schemify already includes WebPage scheme it may be pretty easy to get this supported.

See: http://schema.org/BreadcrumbList
And: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/data-types/breadcrumbs

@mallardduck
Copy link
Author

Looked into this a bit further comparing what's in the Schema.org site and implemented here. I believe this feels like it could still be a useful feature to some users of Schemify, tho I could also see how this feature may fall out of the initial scope of this Plugin.

That said, if you are interested in this feature I'd be happy to take on the work to help implement this. It seems at minimum we would need to add the following Schema classes:

  • Intangible
    • ListItem
    • ItemList
      • BreadcrumbList

Otherwise, if you'd prefer not to add these, yet or ever, I can probably whip up a snippet to accomplish this that could be added to themes.

@stevegrunwell
Copy link
Owner

It looks like Schema's changed a bit of its underlying architecture since I started the plugin, looks like it's time to revisit. BreadcrumbList seems like an immensely-cool and useful schema type to include!

@stevegrunwell stevegrunwell added this to the Version 1.0.0 milestone Jun 14, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants