Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add delay for monitor deletion #306

Open
twardnw opened this issue Jan 21, 2021 · 5 comments
Open

Add delay for monitor deletion #306

twardnw opened this issue Jan 21, 2021 · 5 comments
Labels

Comments

@twardnw
Copy link
Contributor

twardnw commented Jan 21, 2021

We have a scenario where an ingress is "moved" across two namespaces as part of a blue/green deployment. However, to accomplish this, it requires deleting the ingress from one namespace, and recreating it on the other. Currently, the ICM deletes the monitor immediately when the ingress is removed, and then creates a new monitor as soon as the creationDelay passes. It would be good to have a configurable deleteDelay to prevent this from occurring.

@rasheedamir
Copy link
Member

would you like to make for this feature @twardnw? ideally it should be a configuration that user can pass to IMC e.g.

  1. delete immediately
  2. delete after given interval
  3. never delete?

@rasheedamir rasheedamir changed the title add delay for monitor deletion Add delay for monitor deletion Mar 14, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue is stale because it has been open for 60 days with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Apr 13, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue was closed because it has been inactive for 30 days since being marked as stale.

@karl-johan-grahn
Copy link
Contributor

Reopening issues that inadvertently were closed as stale

Copy link

This issue is stale because it has been open for 60 days with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Nov 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants