Spock 2.4-M5

[leonard84]

https://spockframework.org/spock/docs/2.4-M5/index.html

---

This discussion was created from the release Spock 2.4-M5.

[jochenberger]

Thanks for the new release!
When I'm updating from M4, I get the following exception in one of my Specs:

java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: 'java.lang.Object org.spockframework.mock.runtime.BaseMockInterceptor.handleSpockMockInterface(java.lang.reflect.Method, org.spockframework.mock.IMockObject)'
	at org.spockframework.spring.mock.DelegatingInterceptor.intercept(DelegatingInterceptor.java:39)
	at org.spockframework.mock.runtime.ByteBuddyInterceptorAdapter.interceptAbstract(ByteBuddyInterceptorAdapter.java:19)
	at org.spockframework.mock.runtime.MockMakerRegistry.asMockOrNull(MockMakerRegistry.java:164)
	at org.spockframework.mock.MockUtil.isMock(MockUtil.java:38)
	at org.spockframework.spring.SpringMockTestExecutionListener.beforeTestMethod(SpringMockTestExecutionListener.java:101)
	at org.spockframework.spring.AbstractSpringTestExecutionListener.beforeTestMethod(AbstractSpringTestExecutionListener.java:39)
	at org.springframework.test.context.TestContextManager.beforeTestMethod(TestContextManager.java:320)
	at org.spockframework.spring.SpringTestContextManager.beforeTestMethod(SpringTestContextManager.java:60)
	at org.spockframework.spring.SpringInterceptor.interceptSetupMethod(SpringInterceptor.java:53)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.extension.AbstractMethodInterceptor.intercept(AbstractMethodInterceptor.java:30)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.extension.MethodInvocation.proceed(MethodInvocation.java:122)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.model.MethodInfo.invoke(MethodInfo.java:157)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.model.MethodInfo.invoke(MethodInfo.java:157)
	at java.base/java.util.ArrayList.forEach(ArrayList.java:1596)
	at org.spockframework.runtime.model.MethodInfo.invoke(MethodInfo.java:157)
	at java.base/java.util.ArrayList.forEach(ArrayList.java:1596)

The spec uses a @SpringBean field.

[AndreasTu]

Hey @jochenberger,
could you please open up an issue incl. an simple reproducer if possible?

[jochenberger]

Sure: #2075