-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feature request #1
Comments
yeah, of course, but pipelines still going block, an alternative is creating threads for commands. If you have something as an example, I'll reproduce. Or did I get it wrong? show me your idea bro thanks for contributing! |
Let's implement this. but for extented commands, demon of havoc uses job command, I can create this. do you think best implement this for all commands executed or create "job" command to this? |
Sorry, I have removed the fork function and improved the program. Here is the code
|
hi, bro
Can you obtain command output through pipelines? This can avoid blocking long running commands
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: