Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Solid People to RDF : What to display or store? #15

Open
jeff-zucker opened this issue Jun 11, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Solid People to RDF : What to display or store? #15

jeff-zucker opened this issue Jun 11, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@jeff-zucker
Copy link
Member

Please use this issue to discuss which of the fields for Solid Team members shown in the card below should be a) stored for our querying and/or b) displayed to users on sp.org either required or optional and also to discuss appearance formatting here. See also Solid People to RDF : Which ontologies?.

marrelle-sample

@jeff-zucker
Copy link
Member Author

@justinwb commented that "board" is not an appropriate term. The term "facilitator" might work. For example DEI-Faciilitators facilitate the DEI-Team Editor-Facilitators facilitate the panels.

@kay-kim
Copy link

kay-kim commented Aug 30, 2021

Hey Jeff -- this looks amazing. Just wondering:

  • Instead of Teams, maybe "Solid Teams"?
  • Also, maybe add to the teams in case people people are interested.
  • I'm a little ambivalent about the "Works At" field. On one hand, it's a common bio detail. On the other hand, it almost seems to pull focus away from Solid. Maybe either remove or lower in prominence by incorporating as part of the bio (like your example shows).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants