Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement specutils as an option #323

Open
simontorres opened this issue Sep 4, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Implement specutils as an option #323

simontorres opened this issue Sep 4, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@simontorres
Copy link
Member

The wavelength solution implementation is not flexible enough (at least in my opinion). So, maybe I should start talking about implementations. My idea is to keep the current way of writing the raw wavelength solution in the custom method developed for the pipeline, the iraf-compatible method and add an option to let specutils take care of the solution handling process.

It should not be the default option to not disrupt current operations but I believe at some point it should be the default.

The custom implementation is OK because the code for writing and reading are provided.

@simontorres simontorres added this to the V1.3.2 Release milestone Sep 4, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant