You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
On runpod, A100-80GB is listed separately asA100-80GB-SXM. Since SkyPilot doesn't currently distinguish between PCIE and SXM4 variants, we should probably change A100-80GB-SXM to A100-80GB in our catalog.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
On runpod, A100-80GB is listed separately asA100-80GB-SXM. Since SkyPilot doesn't currently distinguish between PCIE and SXM4 variants, we should probably change A100-80GB-SXM to A100-80GB in our catalog.
On RunPod, there are both PCIE and SXM version on the same region. Changing to A100-80GB will make it fail to choose those SXM instance types unless a user specify the instance type directly. Does that sound good to you?
I see... I was confused because A100-80GB is SXM4 on gcp, but looks like on runpod we will provision PCIE unless user explicitly asks for A100-80GB-SXM.
For consistency, should we make A100-80GB on runpod correspond to the SXM4 instance, and list A100-80GB-PCIE separately?
On runpod,
A100-80GB
is listed separately asA100-80GB-SXM
. Since SkyPilot doesn't currently distinguish between PCIE and SXM4 variants, we should probably changeA100-80GB-SXM
toA100-80GB
in our catalog.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: