[Feature request] Groups for shared links

[jonathan-s]

When sharing links you might not want to share links to all users that belong to the platform. So if two users belong to the same group, both users will be able to see the shared link. A third user does not belong to this group and will thus not be able to see the shared link.

[sissbruecker]

I think that goes a bit beyond the scope of what I want to support with bookmark sharing. The feature is already quite complex and adding checks for user groups and an appropriate UI for managing those relationships would add quite a bit more. I'll leave this open to see if there is interest. Would also useful to write down a concrete use-case why you need this, rather than an abstract one.

[Thom-Ernst]

This could be useful in cases where you would like different teams to have access to different bookmarks, for example, you could have an engineering team and a dev team. Both needs access to some of the same resources, but the devs will needs bookmarks to certain code repo's or code documentation, whereas the engineers will require easy access to certain integration tools and dashboards. For me personally, it would be nice if i could use one instance of the tool to give my colleagues access to certain resources, and also my family and friends, but of course, they shouldn't combine. I would then be able to access both. Another solution for this would be to spin up a second instance, but I see no harm in checking, when the bookmark is shared, to which groups it is shared, and then to check if the user is in said group.