You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When a Field is constructed from a parametrized type, it can't correctly infer the underlying type without an explicit annotation. This is trivial to add, but irritating boilerplate.
Ideally fields would automatically do this inference, rather than needing to be "prompted" in this way. This feels like a higher kinded types problem though, so I'm not sure if there is a solution.
The issue exists for any field constructed with an underlying type which has a parameter.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When a Field is constructed from a parametrized type, it can't correctly infer the underlying type without an explicit annotation. This is trivial to add, but irritating boilerplate.
Ideally fields would automatically do this inference, rather than needing to be "prompted" in this way. This feels like a higher kinded types problem though, so I'm not sure if there is a solution.
The issue exists for any field constructed with an underlying type which has a parameter.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: