New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review how non-named requirements are locked into candidates #38

Open

uranusjr opened this issue Sep 6, 2018 · 1 comment

Member

uranusjr commented Sep 6, 2018

pypa/pipenv#2826. I think Passa currently also locks editable VCS to a specific ref.

Really though, non-local editable is just very confusing to me, to the point I suspect the whole design is just bad.

Member

techalchemy commented Sep 6, 2018

Hmm good point. I’m guessing the editable element is supposed to mean that it doesn’t need a specific hash... lets follow up on this one

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment