Replies: 5 comments
-
Do others agree this would be a good idea? If so I could open PR with this. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
we don't have any js dependency beside jquery (which can probably be removed as well). No plans or need for ES6 either. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi, I am closing this. Feel free to re-open if you think this would be of significant help for us. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi @sonalkr132, Thanks for the feedback.
As far as I can see there's also 2 extra JS dependencies in
Apart from the usefulness of keeping the existing dependencies up to date more easily, opening this issue was also motivated by the fact that I was having trouble introducing a new JS dependency in the WebAuthn pull request (#2108 (comment)). The complication was due to the fact that Not a huge thing - but wanted to give more details behind my original motivation if helpful. Thanks again. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
this is valid point. I think our intention with vendoring everything is to avoid depending on third party system for build/deployment. I guess this should be open for discussion. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I think it would be good to have
webpacker
/webpack
for managing and updating JS depedencies more easily.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions