Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for non-Chrome browsers #211

Open
john-light opened this issue Apr 14, 2022 · 5 comments
Open

Add support for non-Chrome browsers #211

john-light opened this issue Apr 14, 2022 · 5 comments

Comments

@john-light
Copy link

The app currently has an error when the user visits in a non-Chrome browser:

Only Chrome browser is allowed

Screenshot 2022-04-14 075150

It would be great if the app could be used in non-Chrome browsers (e.g. Firefox-based browsers) too.

@josedahlquist
Copy link
Collaborator

We've found some issues with the hardware wallets that made us decide to focus for the initial release on Chrome alone.
We will work on expanding the compatibility for the next release.
Thanks for bringing this up

@raucao
Copy link

raucao commented May 18, 2023

It shouldn't be a problem with Trezor, because it's using the Trezor Bridge anyway. In any case, I don't understand the need for requiring specific wallets for the app in the first place. Can't it just show a BTC address to send to from any wallet?

Ledger and Trezor may have large market shares, but they're obviously by far not the only wallets that people use. Requiring people to use an abysmally slow NFT wallet like Liquality to pipe their BTC through on the way to RBTC generally seems like a non-optimal design to me.

I would propose a 4th connect option, which would be to enter either a list of addresses, or simply an XPUB to use, so that the app becomes compatible with all other wallets in the ecosystem.

@alexjavabraz
Copy link
Collaborator

@raucao appreciate your comment, currently, we're testing every version to maintain compatibility with some hardware wallets. What guides us to new implementations and improvements are the needs and suggestions of our customers, so we welcome your suggestions and we will evaluate the possibility of making it as flexible as possible.

@john-light
Copy link
Author

@raucao your comment is off-topic to this issue, so I created a new issue to discuss here

@raucao
Copy link

raucao commented May 29, 2023

Appreciate it. However, it's not entirely OT, because:

We've found some issues with the hardware wallets that made us decide to focus for the initial release on Chrome alone.

So adding support for all bitcoin wallets would also add support for all browsers.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants