[Suggestion] Mention if repo is deprecated

[hmenzagh]

Mention in the lists if the repo is deprecated or not.
Something like :

• 🔴 CUPS Printing - Script to print directly to reMarkable Cloud from CUPS using rMAPI.
• ✅ reMarkable_syncthing - Syncthing on reMarkable.

[Barabazs]

As these are all individual third party repos/scripts/... they will never be "deprecated" in the programming sense.
Wouldn't it be better to tag a repo as "abandoned" instead? But keep in mind that an abandoned repo could still be revived later on.
Who will keep track of this status? 🤷‍♂️

[Ameb]

I agree with Barabazs. Even the awesome list have been abandoned for a while (till @Barabazs and @Liblor stepped in).

[axkibe]

As these are all individual third party repos/scripts/... they will never be "deprecated" in the programming sense. Wouldn't it be better to tag a repo as "abandoned" instead? But keep in mind that an abandoned repo could still be revived later on. Who will keep track of this status? man_shrugging

Well since the cloud API has recently changed a bunch of project actually are "deprecated" in a sense they don't work anymore. That would be super helpful in the list to kind of mark the projects that just won't work. (they might again, if someone picks it up and adapts it to the new API.. which is as far I know realized currently still not known)

[Eeems]

I've started marking archived repos with (Unmaintained) for now. #177 may eventually have a better solution for keeping track of what is supported by specific repos.