Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New "Normalize" behavior #57

Open
21millions-nostr opened this issue Mar 22, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

New "Normalize" behavior #57

21millions-nostr opened this issue Mar 22, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@21millions-nostr
Copy link

First of all, this is an awesome software and project!

I thing a new mechanic can be added to the normalize width, height and size

Current state

Unless I'm missing something, currently beeref normalize (by width, height or size) by changing ALL the images to an average width, height or size.

Example

image

Normalizing by width

image

The big image got slimmer while the other got wider.

Suggested behavior

Maybe it will be useful to be able to normalize the width, height or size to match one image.

For example, normalizing width:

  1. Normalizing the width of the images to match the width of the first image selected

(Selection order: Image_1, Image_2, Image_3, al widths will be normalized to match Image_1's width)

  1. If Select all is used, normalize to match the widest image on the selection set (other criteria can be used here, I'm all ears in this regard)
@rbreu rbreu added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 26, 2023
@senntore
Copy link

senntore commented Dec 16, 2023

I think the current behavior is fine & the second suggestion is great.
Though your first suggestion has some flaw as when we selected images by holding & dragging left click, it's not always obvious to us users as to what is the first selection. And with this feature, I might accidentally make the images smaller or larger than what I want them to be.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants