You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've recently discovered an inconsistency in the Radix Colors documentation regarding the contrast ratios for text.
Documentation Reference
According to Understanding the Scale, "Steps 11 and 12—which are designed for text—are guaranteed to pass 4.5:1 contrast ratio on top of a step 3 background from the same scale."
Issue Found
However, upon reviewing and calculating the contrast ratios for several scales using Chrome Dev Tools, I found that the Yellow, Amber, and Orange scales did not meet the specified 4.5:1 contrast guideline when used in the manner described.
I believe that updating the documentation to reflect more accurate information or adjusting the color scales (Yellow, Amber, Orange) to meet the original guideline would be highly beneficial for users.
Thank you for considering this issue. I appreciate the work you do and am eager to assist in any way possible to help resolve this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello Radix Colors team,
I've recently discovered an inconsistency in the Radix Colors documentation regarding the contrast ratios for text.
Documentation Reference
According to Understanding the Scale, "Steps 11 and 12—which are designed for text—are guaranteed to pass 4.5:1 contrast ratio on top of a step 3 background from the same scale."
Issue Found
However, upon reviewing and calculating the contrast ratios for several scales using Chrome Dev Tools, I found that the Yellow, Amber, and Orange scales did not meet the specified 4.5:1 contrast guideline when used in the manner described.
Details
Suggestion
I believe that updating the documentation to reflect more accurate information or adjusting the color scales (Yellow, Amber, Orange) to meet the original guideline would be highly beneficial for users.
Thank you for considering this issue. I appreciate the work you do and am eager to assist in any way possible to help resolve this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: