🎉 👏 Thank you for wanting to contribute and be part of this project! 👏 🎉
This document describes our guidelines for contributing to Validations Engine and its modules. The content will help you with guides so you can contribute more easily and, as a consequence, the code can maintain a high quality standard. Not all possible cases will be covered in this document, so we hope you use your best judgment, and feel free to help us enhance this document in a pull request.
At the bare minimum you'll need the following for your development environment:
It is strongly recommended to also install and use pyenv:
This tool eases the burden of dealing with virtualenvs and having to activate and deactivate'em by hand. Once you run
pyenv local my-project-venv
the directory you're in will be bound to the my-project-venv
virtual environment and
then you will have never to bother again activating the correct venv.
git clone [email protected]:quintoandar/validations-engine.git
cd validations-engine
Run make help
for more information on ready to use scripts.
make environment
If you need to configure your development environment in your IDE, notice
pyenv will store your python under
~/.pyenv/versions/validations-engine/bin/python
.
If you receive one error of missing OpenSSL to run the pyenv install
, you can try to fix running:
sudo apt install -y libssl1.0-dev
make requirements-all
The requirements of the project were split in order to better organize and facilitate the installation of both full and individual sets of requirements, according to each one's needs.
|-- requirements.dev.txt < for developing / changing the source code >
|-- requirements.lint.txt < for linting code >
|-- requirements.test.txt < for running unit and integration tests >
|-- requirements.txt < for the project being able to run in a production environment >
|-- docs/requirements.docs.txt < for recreating the documentation's files >
If you receive one error like this one:
"import setuptools, tokenize;__file__='/tmp/pip-build-98gth33d/googleapis-common-protos/setup.py';
....
failed with error code 1 in /tmp/pip-build-98gth33d/googleapis-common-protos/
You can try to fix it running:
python -m pip install --upgrade pip setuptools wheel
Library's content live under validations_engine module, where you'll find the client main class.
TL;DR:
- Just run
make apply-style
before you commit. - Check if everything is fine with
make checks
.
This project follows:
This project uses some nice tooling to unify style across the project's codebase
and improve quality. You don't need to worry about manually reviewing your
style and imports, black
will automatically fix most of style inconsistencies:
make apply-style
Additionally Flake 8 is used to check for other things such as unnecessary imports and code-complexity.
You can check Flake 8 and Black by running the following within the project root:
make checks
We use type hint in all of our methods arguments and in the return of the methods too. This way, our methods will have a very explicit declaration of their expected inputs and outputs, making it easier for anyone to understand them. Besides, using type hints will help us with documentation and make it easier to find/prevent bugs. More information can be found in Python docs
Example:
def read(self, format: str, options: dict, stream: bool = False) -> DataFrame:
We use Mypy for static type checking.
The command make checks
will analyse the typing. But if you desire you can run
make type-check
for analysing only the typing.
We chose the python reStructuredType format for docstrings
You can easily configure PyCharm to use this style in "Python Integrated Tools":
There is no need to write about the types of arguments or returns of a method since we decide to use type hints instead. By using this plugin, metadata about types in documentation can be easily generated by Sphinx.
Example of class documentation:
class ColumnBuilder(AbstractBuilder):
"""Builds thrift FieldSchema object."""
def __init__(self, name: str, type: str, comment: str = None) -> None:
"""
Constructor.
:param name: name of the field
:param type: type of the field
:param comment: column's comment
"""
self.name = name
self.type = type
self.comment = comment
TL;DR: Just run make tests
to check if your code is fine.
This project is thoroughly tested as of the time of this writing. Unit tests rely under the test module and integration tests under the integration_test module. pytest is used to write all of this project's tests.
Before opening a PR, check if all your new code is 100% covered with tests.
The make tests
executes both integration and unit tests. But you can run just
unit tests with the make command at the project's root:
make unit-tests
You can run the integration tests in the same fashion:
make integration-test
Style check is available through make too:
make style-check
- First install requirements running
make requirements-docs
. - To recreate .rst files run
make update-docs
. If a new module was added, edit docs/source/index.rst file to add the rst file for the module manually. - To test the documentation generated run
make docs
. It will generate html documentation files in docs/build/html folder.
Pull Request is, in summary, a request for changing code in a given repository.
They're are typically used by teams for shared collaboration and feature work or bug fixes. The idea is to make sure well written and bug-free code gets pushed to the repository. It is a way to develop high-quality code.
Once you make changes you need in your code in the branch, you submit a PR. Once submitted, interested parties will perform a code review and provide you with any feedback/changes needed. So, it's important that your PR follow some principles:
First all, your branch name should be meaningful. Remember that this is the first description of your code change and anybody can checkout into your branch to use or review it.
There are two patterns to the branch name:
- camelCase:
addPrGuidelines
- kebab:
add-create-pr
(we prefer this one)
And a good practice in some repository is to follow the features/bugfixes branches: feature/add-create-pr
Before you start working on a story/feature, make a mental/written note on how you want to break it down into several smaller pull requests, so it's possible to define a sufficient narrow scope for your changes. Also do not forget to assign yourself regarding the PR.
It is essential to have a good description of your PR, but.. what is a good description?
We usually consider a good description when it has:
- Explain the context of that feature/fix;
- Why and how it's done;
- Unit and integration tests, when applicable;
Basically, this can be achieved by simply following our PR template. :)
In all project, we have different labels, like "WIP", "review", "bug", etc. Consider always adding the right label to make your reviewers' lives easier.