You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently it is kind of a hassle to include back engine vehicles the right way in QBCore. QB-Inventory, QB-Target and QB-VehicleFailure all provide their own list of vehicles with back engines. This causes an enormous overhead.
Feature description
Back engine vehicles should be marked as such in the vehicles.lua by an attribute like ['backEngine'] = true. On no back engine vehicles this attribute can be omitted (nil == false).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Problem
Currently it is kind of a hassle to include back engine vehicles the right way in QBCore. QB-Inventory, QB-Target and QB-VehicleFailure all provide their own list of vehicles with back engines. This causes an enormous overhead.
Feature description
Back engine vehicles should be marked as such in the
vehicles.lua
by an attribute like['backEngine'] = true
. On no back engine vehicles this attribute can be omitted (nil == false).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: