Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow packaging==20.3 #377

Open
mdjones opened this issue Apr 17, 2020 · 6 comments
Open

Allow packaging==20.3 #377

mdjones opened this issue Apr 17, 2020 · 6 comments

Comments

@mdjones
Copy link

mdjones commented Apr 17, 2020

Currently I have conflicts performing installation of Bonobo when other packages use packaging 20. Could you please open up the version requirement for packaging so that is includes packaging==20.3?

@hartym
Copy link
Member

hartym commented Apr 30, 2020

This is already the case in 0.7 version, will close when the stable is released.

@variable
Copy link

Any ETA for releasing 0.7? I am stuck with this issue.

@YannickAaron
Copy link

Same here, can't use it because of incompatibility caused by packaging<=20.0

@gdvalderrama
Copy link

@hartym any chance 0.7 will be released?
or at the very least document 0.7.0rc3 to know if there are backward incompatible changes etc

as it is now we have to either remove bonobo or be stuck dependency-wise until 0.7 is released

@gdvalderrama
Copy link

gdvalderrama commented May 5, 2023

In this issue a workaround is suggested and worked for me, it's running python -m pip install -U pip-tools, additionally I also had to pip3 install --upgrade packaging.

@anentropic
Copy link

anentropic commented Oct 5, 2023

╰─ pdm add bonobo==0.6.4
Adding packages to default dependencies: bonobo==0.6.4
🔒 Lock failed
Unable to find a resolution for packaging
because of the following conflicts:
  packaging (from [email protected])
  packaging>=22.0 (from [email protected])
  packaging~=19.0 (from [email protected])

so it's not really installable any more, needs a release which relaxes the version constraint

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants