Consistent formats for JOSS dois

[lwasser]

          > I'm also noticing some inconsistency in JOSS ... Both will work! My question is, should we be consistent in how we save the doi and always link to the doi rather than the paper in terms of the data we store in our "database," aka YML file?

I'm not sure! This feels weird to me as the DOIs themselves resoilve to the paper and if I use the python-doi package to validate a DOI like 10.21105/joss.05221 i get a link to the paper:

>>> import doi
>>> doi.validate_doi('10.21105/joss.05221')
'https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.05221'

I'm not sure what's best here. This may be something we engage JOSS directly on and follow up.

Originally posted by @banesullivan in #243 (comment)

This is an issue to followup on with JOSS potentially - what doi url is better/ ideal or does it matter? cc @banesullivan