Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Visual Studio "Previous IPDB not found, fall back to full compilation." #2204

Open
Codinablack opened this issue Apr 16, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
Labels
support-request A request for help from the community

Comments

@Codinablack
Copy link

Before opening a new issue, please use the issue search feature to see if a similar issue already exists. If not, please help us help you by filling in the template below.

What are you trying to do?
I am trying to generate a visual studio project solution, that when used, can properly find the "previous ipdb".

What problem are you having?
The project solution when ran never finds the previously compiled ipdb, and therefore does a completely full compilation again.

What have you tried so far?
I have tried changing debugformat values, as well as various flags and options.
I have also tried directing the visual studio solution through premake to the location of the ipdb.

What version of Premake are you using?
I am using Dev Branch, compiled on my own.

Anything else we should know?
I have tried changing settings manually in the visual studio project without luck.

Here is my premake script.
premake5.txt

@Codinablack Codinablack added the support-request A request for help from the community label Apr 16, 2024
@Jarod42
Copy link
Contributor

Jarod42 commented Apr 16, 2024

filter "system:windows"
    openmp "On"
    characterset "MBCS"
    debugformat "c7"
    flags {"NoIncrementalLink"}
    linkoptions {"/IGNORE:4099"}
filter {}

(Better to place premake5.lua content in block code instead of link BTW)

isn't debugformat "c7" problematic?

@Codinablack
Copy link
Author

filter "system:windows"
    openmp "On"
    characterset "MBCS"
    debugformat "c7"
    flags {"NoIncrementalLink"}
    linkoptions {"/IGNORE:4099"}
filter {}

(Better to place premake5.lua content in block code instead of link BTW)

isn't debugformat "c7" problematic?

I don't think so, but the reason debugformat "c7" was even added in the first place was to try to solve this issue, like I stated above, I have tried different values, but also only even found debugformat because I was trying to solve this problem.

@Codinablack
Copy link
Author

Anyone have any clue how I can resolve this??

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
support-request A request for help from the community
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants