记一次kafka消费异常问题的排查
部分消费组无法通过broker(new-consumer)正常消费数据,更改消费组名后恢复正常。
group名(可能涉及业务信息,group名非真实名):
group1-打马赛克
group2-打马赛克
kafka版本: 0.9.0.1
describe对应消费组时抛如下异常:
Error while executing consumer group command The group coordinator is not available.
org.apache.kafka.common.errors.GroupCoordinatorNotAvailableException: The group coordinator is not available.
搜索到业界有类似问题,不过都没有解释清楚为什么出现这种问题,以及如何彻底解决(重启不算)!
日志是程序员的第一手分析资料。Kafka服务端因为现网有大量服务在运营,不适合开启debug日志,所以我们只能从客户端入手。
将客户端日志等级开成debug级别,发现持续循环地滚动如下日志:
19:52:41.785 TKD [main] DEBUG o.a.k.c.c.i.AbstractCoordinator - Issuing group metadata request to broker 43
19:52:41.788 TKD [main] DEBUG o.a.k.c.c.i.AbstractCoordinator - Group metadata response ClientResponse(receivedTimeMs=1587642761788, disconnected=false, request=ClientRequest(expectResponse=true, callback=org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.internals.ConsumerNetworkClient$RequestFutureCompletionHandler@1b68ddbd, request=RequestSend(header={api_key=10,api_version=0,correlation_id=30,client_id=consumer-1}, body={group_id=30cab231-05ed-43ef-96aa-a3ca1564baa3}), createdTimeMs=1587642761785, sendTimeMs=1587642761785), responseBody={error_code=15,coordinator={node_id=-1,host=,port=-1}})
19:52:41.875 TKD [main] DEBUG o.apache.kafka.clients.NetworkClient - Sending metadata request ClientRequest(expectResponse=true, callback=null, request=RequestSend(header={api_key=3,api_version=0,correlation_id=31,client_id=consumer-1}, body={topics=[topic打马赛克]}), isInitiatedByNetworkClient, createdTimeMs=1587642761875, sendTimeMs=0) to node 43
我们大致可以看出循环在做着几件事情(先后不一定准确):
- 从某个broker
Issuing group metadata request
- 获取
Group metadata
- 发起
metadata request
我们聚焦到获取Group metadata
的error关键字responseBody={error_code=15,coordinator={node_id=-1,host=,port=-1}}
,大致得出是kafka服务端没有给出coordinator的node结点信息。
首先我们需要查看api_key=10
请求对应的服务端源码:
需要从kafka.server.KafkaApis
中寻找对应的api接口函数
def handle(request: RequestChannel.Request) {
……
case RequestKeys.GroupCoordinatorKey => handleGroupCoordinatorRequest(request)
……
}
def handleGroupCoordinatorRequest(request: RequestChannel.Request) {
val groupCoordinatorRequest = request.body.asInstanceOf[GroupCoordinatorRequest]
val responseHeader = new ResponseHeader(request.header.correlationId)
if (!authorize(request.session, Describe, new Resource(Group, groupCoordinatorRequest.groupId))) {
val responseBody = new GroupCoordinatorResponse(Errors.GROUP_AUTHORIZATION_FAILED.code, Node.noNode)
requestChannel.sendResponse(new RequestChannel.Response(request, new ResponseSend(request.connectionId, responseHeader, responseBody)))
} else {
val partition = coordinator.partitionFor(groupCoordinatorRequest.groupId)
// get metadata (and create the topic if necessary)
val offsetsTopicMetadata = getOrCreateGroupMetadataTopic(request.securityProtocol)
// 第一个可能存在的问题:offsetsTopicMetadata的errCode不为空
val responseBody = if (offsetsTopicMetadata.errorCode != Errors.NONE.code) {
new GroupCoordinatorResponse(Errors.GROUP_COORDINATOR_NOT_AVAILABLE.code, Node.noNode)
} else {
val coordinatorEndpoint = offsetsTopicMetadata.partitionsMetadata
.find(_.partitionId == partition)
.flatMap {
partitionMetadata => partitionMetadata.leader
}
// 第二个可能存在的问题:coordinatorEndpoint为空
coordinatorEndpoint match {
case Some(endpoint) =>
new GroupCoordinatorResponse(Errors.NONE.code, new Node(endpoint.id, endpoint.host, endpoint.port))
case _ =>
new GroupCoordinatorResponse(Errors.GROUP_COORDINATOR_NOT_AVAILABLE.code, Node.noNode)
}
}
trace("Sending consumer metadata %s for correlation id %d to client %s."
.format(responseBody, request.header.correlationId, request.header.clientId))
requestChannel.sendResponse(new RequestChannel.Response(request, new ResponseSend(request.connectionId, responseHeader, responseBody)))
}
}
其中error_code=15
对应的是Errors.GROUP_COORDINATOR_NOT_AVAILABLE.code
从源码不难看出,导致Errors.GROUP_COORDINATOR_NOT_AVAILABLE.code
可能点有二:
-
疑似问题点一:offsetsTopicMetadata的errCode不为空
offsetsTopicMetadata.errorCode != Errors.NONE.code
offsetsTopicMetadata的errCode不为空,意味着整个
__consumer_offsets
元数据获取都有问题。但是现场只是部分group有问题,这里出问题的可能性不大。 -
疑似问题点二:coordinatorEndpoint为空
val coordinatorEndpoint = offsetsTopicMetadata.partitionsMetadata .find(_.partitionId == partition) .flatMap { partitionMetadata => partitionMetadata.leader }
从
offsetsTopicMetadata
获取到的元数据,过滤出coordinator.partitionFor(groupCoordinatorRequest.groupId)
分区的leader。而coordinator.partitionFor(groupCoordinatorRequest.groupId)
正是与group名相关!这里出问题的可能性极大!
def partitionFor(groupId: String): Int = Utils.abs(groupId.hashCode) % groupMetadataTopicPartitionCount
即取group名的正hashCode模groupMetadataTopicPartitionCount
(即__consumer_offsets
对应的分区数)。
注:可能涉及业务信息,group名非真实名。而结果是正式group名算出的结果。
scala> "group1-打马赛克".hashCode % 50
res2: Int = 43
scala> "group2-打马赛克".hashCode % 50
res3: Int = 43
我们发现2个异常的消费组,其partitionFor
后的值均为43,我们初步判断分区可能与__consumer_offsets
的43分区相关!
接下来我们就要看下offsetsTopicMetadata
相关的逻辑,来确认异常。
val offsetsTopicMetadata = getOrCreateGroupMetadataTopic(request.securityProtocol)
getOrCreateGroupMetadataTopic
-> metadataCache.getTopicMetadata
-> getPartitionMetadata
private def getPartitionMetadata(topic: String, protocol: SecurityProtocol): Option[Iterable[PartitionMetadata]] = {
cache.get(topic).map { partitions =>
partitions.map { case (partitionId, partitionState) =>
val topicPartition = TopicAndPartition(topic, partitionId)
val leaderAndIsr = partitionState.leaderIsrAndControllerEpoch.leaderAndIsr
val maybeLeader = aliveBrokers.get(leaderAndIsr.leader)
val replicas = partitionState.allReplicas
val replicaInfo = getAliveEndpoints(replicas, protocol)
maybeLeader match {
case None =>
debug("Error while fetching metadata for %s: leader not available".format(topicPartition))
new PartitionMetadata(partitionId, None, replicaInfo, Seq.empty[BrokerEndPoint],
Errors.LEADER_NOT_AVAILABLE.code)
case Some(leader) =>
val isr = leaderAndIsr.isr
val isrInfo = getAliveEndpoints(isr, protocol)
if (replicaInfo.size < replicas.size) {
debug("Error while fetching metadata for %s: replica information not available for following brokers %s"
.format(topicPartition, replicas.filterNot(replicaInfo.map(_.id).contains).mkString(",")))
new PartitionMetadata(partitionId, Some(leader.getBrokerEndPoint(protocol)), replicaInfo, isrInfo, Errors.REPLICA_NOT_AVAILABLE.code)
} else if (isrInfo.size < isr.size) {
debug("Error while fetching metadata for %s: in sync replica information not available for following brokers %s"
.format(topicPartition, isr.filterNot(isrInfo.map(_.id).contains).mkString(",")))
new PartitionMetadata(partitionId, Some(leader.getBrokerEndPoint(protocol)), replicaInfo, isrInfo, Errors.REPLICA_NOT_AVAILABLE.code)
} else {
new PartitionMetadata(partitionId, Some(leader.getBrokerEndPoint(protocol)), replicaInfo, isrInfo, Errors.NONE.code)
}
}
}
}
}
offsetsTopicMetadata即对于topic下所有leader、replicaInfo、isr正常分区的元数据信息,所以我们判断__consumer_offsets
43分区leader、replicaInfo、isr等可能存在异常,导致find(_.partitionId == partition)
时找不到根据hashCode取模后对应的分区。
Topic:__consumer_offsets PartitionCount:50 ReplicationFactor:3 Configs:segment.bytes=104857600,cleanup.policy=compact,compression.type=uncompressed
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 0 Leader: 18 Replicas: 18,2,17 Isr: 18
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 1 Leader: 19 Replicas: 19,17,18 Isr: 19,18
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 2 Leader: 20 Replicas: 20,18,19 Isr: 19,20,18
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 3 Leader: 21 Replicas: 21,19,20 Isr: 19,20,21
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 4 Leader: 22 Replicas: 22,20,21 Isr: 20,21,22
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 5 Leader: 23 Replicas: 23,21,22 Isr: 23,21,22
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 6 Leader: 24 Replicas: 24,22,23 Isr: 23,24,22
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 7 Leader: 25 Replicas: 25,23,24 Isr: 23,25,24
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 8 Leader: 26 Replicas: 26,24,25 Isr: 26,25,24
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 9 Leader: 27 Replicas: 27,25,26 Isr: 27,26,25
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 10 Leader: 28 Replicas: 28,26,27 Isr: 27,26,28
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 11 Leader: 27 Replicas: 0,27,28 Isr: 27,28
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 12 Leader: 28 Replicas: 1,28,0 Isr: 28
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 13 Leader: -1 Replicas: 2,0,1 Isr:
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 14 Leader: -1 Replicas: 3,1,2 Isr:
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 15 Leader: -1 Replicas: 4,2,3 Isr:
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 16 Leader: -1 Replicas: 5,3,4 Isr:
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 17 Leader: -1 Replicas: 6,4,5 Isr:
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 18 Leader: -1 Replicas: 7,5,6 Isr:
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 19 Leader: 8 Replicas: 8,6,7 Isr: 8
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 20 Leader: 9 Replicas: 9,7,8 Isr: 9,8
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 21 Leader: 10 Replicas: 10,8,9 Isr: 10,8,9
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 22 Leader: 11 Replicas: 11,9,10 Isr: 11,10,9
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 23 Leader: 12 Replicas: 12,10,11 Isr: 11,12,10
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 24 Leader: 13 Replicas: 13,11,12 Isr: 13,11,12
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 25 Leader: 14 Replicas: 14,12,13 Isr: 13,12,14
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 26 Leader: 15 Replicas: 15,13,14 Isr: 13,14,15
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 27 Leader: 16 Replicas: 16,14,15 Isr: 14,16,15
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 28 Leader: 42 Replicas: 17,15,42 Isr: 42,15
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 29 Leader: 18 Replicas: 18,17,19 Isr: 19,18
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 30 Leader: 19 Replicas: 19,18,20 Isr: 19,20,18
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 31 Leader: 20 Replicas: 20,19,21 Isr: 19,20,21
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 32 Leader: 21 Replicas: 21,20,22 Isr: 20,21,22
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 33 Leader: 22 Replicas: 22,21,23 Isr: 23,21,22
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 34 Leader: 23 Replicas: 23,22,24 Isr: 23,24,22
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 35 Leader: 24 Replicas: 24,23,25 Isr: 23,25,24
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 36 Leader: 25 Replicas: 25,24,26 Isr: 26,25,24
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 37 Leader: 26 Replicas: 26,25,27 Isr: 27,26,25
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 38 Leader: 27 Replicas: 27,26,28 Isr: 27,26,28
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 39 Leader: 28 Replicas: 28,27,0 Isr: 27,28
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 40 Leader: 28 Replicas: 0,28,1 Isr: 28
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 41 Leader: -1 Replicas: 1,0,2 Isr:
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 42 Leader: -1 Replicas: 2,1,3 Isr:
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 43 Leader: -1 Replicas: 3,2,4 Isr:
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 44 Leader: -1 Replicas: 4,3,5 Isr:
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 45 Leader: -1 Replicas: 5,4,6 Isr:
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 46 Leader: -1 Replicas: 6,5,7 Isr:
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 47 Leader: 8 Replicas: 7,6,8 Isr: 8
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 48 Leader: 8 Replicas: 8,7,9 Isr: 9,8
Topic: __consumer_offsets Partition: 49 Leader: 9 Replicas: 9,8,10 Isr: 10,9,8
43分区果然存在leader异常的情况
我们使用UUID批量生成消费组名,使其hashCode取模后为异常分区的分区号,再使用其进行消费时均出现消费异常的问题。
-
为什么
__consumer_offsets
部分分区会产生leader、replicaInfo、isr异常? 与网络抖动和一些集群操作可能有关,需要具体问题具体分析 -
如何将
__consumer_offsets
异常分区恢复正常?
这里不详细介绍可以参考http://blog.itpub.net/31543630/viewspace-2212467/ 。
-
Kafka new-consumer设计文档 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Kafka+Detailed+Consumer+Coordinator+Design
-
Kafka无法消费?!我的分布式消息服务Kafka却稳如泰山! http://blog.itpub.net/31543630/viewspace-2212467/
-
Problem with Kafka 0.9 Client http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Problem-with-Kafka-0-9-Client-td4975.html
-
ErrorMapping https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/0.9.0/core/src/main/scala/kafka/common/ErrorMapping.scala