GitHub Community
Add 'password' input type for manual workflows #12764
Replies: 21 comments 1 reply
-
|
Appreciate the feedback @TaffarelJr - this is good feedback. There are some details that we'll definitely want to think through because - as you note - these are your secrets. 😁 But your use case makes sense. Thanks again for the feedback. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Has there been any updates for this? I am interested in this as well. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi @ethomson Any updates on Adding |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I could be wrong, but I think it's more secure keeping some secrets on my offline password manager. That's why I would rather type passwords each time I need to manually trigger a workflow. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
-
|
This is just what I need, a password input type. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This is exactly what I am looking for |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I would love that |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Over a year... and nothing new? I do confirm that it is simply not possible to use Azure (non) secrets (at all) in certain cases. (e.g. echo from some base 64...) So please add another string type such as masked, password, secret, whatever you like, as long as it has a masking effect when you enter it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
While the comments might help, you might also want to upvote the author's post so it gets more attention. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Bump |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
and others
-
The input types for manual workflows are great so far:
stringchoicebooleanenvironmentBut I could really use a
passwordinput type.I need to deploy infrastructure-as-code from my GitHub Action, and I need to be able to prompt for Admin credentials from whoever is running the workflow. I bet I could make it work with a plain
string, but I have a feeling my password shouldn't be floating across the internet unprotected. At the very least, a masking effect would be nice to prevent the password from being seen on the screen.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions