You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be great if we could rework the types to better follow the spec. Sure the spec is only a draft, but it should provide a good basis for making sure we aren't missing anything major :)
Currently, keywords get parsed into an attributes field of elements, but this does not match the spec. Whilst I agree this is a useful transformation, we should be doing this as an optional post step - the AST should match the spec as closely as possible.
remove attributes field from AST items
provide an optional post transformation that assigns attributes to their corresponding objects
ensure only standard keys are supported by default
provide a parser option to allow additional keys
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It would be great if we could rework the types to better follow the spec. Sure the spec is only a draft, but it should provide a good basis for making sure we aren't missing anything major :)
TODO Keywords
See https://orgmode.org/worg/dev/org-syntax.html#Affiliated_keywords.
Currently, keywords get parsed into an
attributes
field of elements, but this does not match the spec. Whilst I agree this is a useful transformation, we should be doing this as an optional post step - the AST should match the spec as closely as possible.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: