Recursion mapping: ord://{inscription id} vs /content/{inscription id} ? #2287
HGraphPunks
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
While building more standard metadata, referencing an ordinal feels weird and an anti-pattern on most networks /protocols.
I understand there's a ton already minting with the content path, and that'll have to exist for backwards compatibility, but is anyone open to using the ord:// protocol prefix to match typical dev patterns found in NFT metadata and across multiple protocols? (http://, https://, ipfs://, etc)
Examples:
IPFS:
ipfs://{CID}
Hedera File Service
hfs://{topic id}
Ordinals:
ord://{Inscription id}
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions