-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug: Red Hat CoreOS incorrect IBM Cloud OS Image label name #8141
Comments
@cjschaef thoughts? |
@cjschaef bump? |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle stale |
Version
All
Platform:
ibmcloud
Install types impacted:
openshift-install
)What happened?
Import of the QCOW2 OS Image file into an IBM Cloud OS Image using incorrect label name, causes technical anomolies (such as not importing to different IaaS Profiles) and will cause report/audit issues for Red Hat.
The OS Image label name used in the code is
rhel-coreos-stable-amd64
, but it should bered-coreos-amd64-byol
. This in two places:openshift-install
: openshift/installer/data/data/ibmcloud/network/image/main.tf#L44The Web GUI shows this distinction in the clearest way:
What you expected to happen?
Correct OS Image label name should be used. If I recall correctly from 18 months ago, Red Hat initiated the request for
red-coreos-amd64-byol
OS Image label name for correct marketing name purposes and auditing purposes.How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible)?
Run any installation to IBM Cloud, and the IBM Cloud OS Image will be imported incorrectly, as shown below in Web GUI (or CLI output):
Anything else we need to know?
When fixed, it should look like this in Web GUI or CLI output:
References
Previous commit where the OS Image label name was updated from Fedora CoreOS:
dcac9ac
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: