-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 86
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Benchmarks vs numpy, scipy, sklearn, Pytorch #93
Comments
Hi @nikolaydubina, Yes, that's on our TODO list. By the way, if you had to choose, would you prefer benchmarks on single operations (e.g., matrix-vector multiplication) or on higher level tasks, like NER and Question-Answering, etc? |
Absolutely on low level tasks. I would expect people implementing their own high-level algorithms, and they would have their own benchmarks. That being said, golden standard for high-level tasks also useful, so that people will see if they are way off with their code. Thank you! |
It's decided then. To start, we will make a direct comparison of the basic operators of the spaGO auto-grad package with the PyTorch ones. Do you feel like helping on this task? Every contribution is precious :) |
Sure, I will see if I have time :) |
Did you guys compare this library for equivalent implementations in numpy, scipy, sklear, Pytorch, Tensorflow?
If GPU is not supported, you can try reporting CPU versions. AFAIK both Pytorch and Tensorflow have cpu modes for their tensor operations.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: