New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

coding_guidelines: correct term from "alphabetical" to "chronological" order #5402

Open

gplanansky opened this issue May 10, 2024 · 0 comments

Labels

gplanansky commented May 10, 2024

https://github.com/neomjs/neo/blob/2001220a26c5c763102aa5fdc27bc6bf9af13463/.github/CODING_GUIDELINES.md

Should not "chronological" be "alphabetical"?

(19) Class content order:

    static configs (ordered chronologically)
    static config as the last item. This one does not need a comment, but is prefixed with an empty line.
    non-static class fields (ordered chronologically)
    construct() in case you are using it
    all other class methods are ordered chronologically and are prefixed with an empty line.

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

gplanansky added the bug label

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment