You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi! I am trying out act to see whether we could use it to help us develop our internal workflows and actions, and ran into an issue I wanted to ask for feedback on: we have a workflow A that does some work, then triggers a call for a workflow B to run in a second repo via a repository_dispatch even using an action that was contributed to GH. I am assuming that, when we run this workflow A using act, it will actually contact GH and try to get that workflow B to run on that other repo, as normal - but I would rather it saved the event payload to a file, so I could run that second workflow using act after the first one completed. Is this something that act would be smart enough to do on its own - somehow catch requests to the particular URL that GH uses for repo dispatch and save them to a file, instead - or would I need to fork that action we are using to trigger the call to B so that it's smart enough to recognize whether it's running in act and handle the call differentl (by saving the event...).
Thank you!
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hi! I am trying out act to see whether we could use it to help us develop our internal workflows and actions, and ran into an issue I wanted to ask for feedback on: we have a workflow A that does some work, then triggers a call for a workflow B to run in a second repo via a repository_dispatch even using an action that was contributed to GH. I am assuming that, when we run this workflow A using act, it will actually contact GH and try to get that workflow B to run on that other repo, as normal - but I would rather it saved the event payload to a file, so I could run that second workflow using act after the first one completed. Is this something that act would be smart enough to do on its own - somehow catch requests to the particular URL that GH uses for repo dispatch and save them to a file, instead - or would I need to fork that action we are using to trigger the call to B so that it's smart enough to recognize whether it's running in act and handle the call differentl (by saving the event...).
Thank you!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions