New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pseudo classes #850
Comments
I wouldn't worry about the validator as long as it works -- especially where it concerns non-standard stuff like this. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
184 | | ::-moz-focus-inner is an unknown vendor extended pseudo-element
184 | | ::-moz-focus-inner is an unknown vendor extended pseudo-element
184 | | ::-moz-focus-inner is an unknown vendor extended pseudo-element
184 | | ::-focus-inner is an unknown vendor extended pseudo-element
192 | | :-moz-focusing is an unknown vendor extended pseudo-class
192 | | :-moz-focusing is an unknown vendor extended pseudo-class
192 | | :-moz-focusing is an unknown vendor extended pseudo-class
192 | | :-moz-focusing is an unknown vendor extended pseudo-class
248 | | ::-webkit-inner-spin-button is an unknown vendor extended pseudo-element
248 | | ::-webkit-outer-spin-button is an unknown vendor extended pseudo-element
266 | | ::-webkit-search-decoration is an unknown vendor extended pseudo-element
276 | | ::-webkit-file-upload-button is an unknown vendor extended pseudo-element
I have gone through the normalize CSS, I have managed to eliminate the errors, but the pseudo-classes are proving awkward. If MDN lists the pseudo-classes, as well as CSS3, why does the validator flag them up?
If I have left the 'normalize.css v8.0.1 | MIT Licence | github.com/necolas/normalize.css' at the top of the stylesheet, is that sufficient to cite and avoid plagiarism?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: