-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 70
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve repo structure #82
Comments
Ping @nathos |
@guerrero: Agreed on all counts. A long-running Given the install counts, I think it likely makes sense for the Sublime package to be its own repo at this point. I'd also like to message existing users (via an update) to tell them to install the new package. I brought some of this up a long while back in #58. According to wbond, it might be possible to make the transition rather seamless. The package has been in a rather tenuous state for quite some time, and I've been hesitant to make large changes to it for fear of disrupting the work of many people. I think it'd be great if you would like to spearhead this effort. Whether that means creating a new project, adding you as a collaborator, or even transferring this repo to you, I'm open to all options. |
Nice, I want to do some research to find the better solution for the sublime branch problem before starting to contribute to this repo if it's ok with you. Thanks! |
IMHO it would be nice to improve the structure of this repo or split it into two differents, one for Textmate and another for Sublime. The problem here is that
master
branch is around 50 commits ahead ofsublime
and due to this fact syntax and completion files are totally different between them.Another problems to solve:
README.md
that there's a specific branch for SublimeI'm ready to collaborate as a mantainer or contributor to help to implement this features.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: