AWS SecretsManager Connector

[cwgroppe]

How would y'all feel about a AWS SecretsManager Connector? I'm pretty close to having the basic functionally finished for it (created, delete, update, list) and I'll add IT test for those as well.

[paualarco]

Yeah, and why not! :)

Would it be a wrapper on top of the aws client?

In that case I would just ask that the connector follows the api design of the AWS family in monix-connect (dynamodb and s3), and what I mean by that is to expose the client as a cats effect Resource, which could either be created by passing the configurations by parameters, like done here for the S3 connector, and also support creating de client from config file.

Would be also good if we also expose overloaded methods that also not requires to create the java objects with builders and so on, like if you want to perform a DescribeSecretRequest, you could do it either like:

SecretManager.describeRequest("secretName"): Task[DescribeSecretResponse]

or like:

val secretRequest = DescribeSecretRequest.builder()
                .secretId(secretName)
                .build();
SecretManager.describeRequest(secretRequest): Task[DescribeSecretResponse]
```

[cwgroppe]

Its a wrapper on top of the aws client like s3, so much so that a lot of the code is mimicked between the two. Calling to get a secret looks like this:

val secMan = SecretsManager.create(staticCredProvider, Region.US_EAST_2, endpoint)
secMan.use{sm => sm.getSecretValue("test1")}.runSyncUnsafe(30.seconds)(runnerIO,permit)

or

val secUn = SecretsManager.createUnsafe(staticCredProvider, Region.US_EAST_2, endpoint)
secUn.listSecrets().toListL.runSyncUnsafe(30.seconds)(runnerIO,permit)

where runnerIO is my scheduler. But yeah there are some overloaded methods that I've had a weird time dealing with (just chose which one to use basically), so the describeRequest example sounds like a good idea to avoid that and I'll have those built ins.

[paualarco]

that looks good! :)

[cwgroppe]

So I have created, delete, update, and listSecrets. Is this enough functionality for an initial pull request or should I wait until I have all of it?

[paualarco]

You can create a WIP pull request if u prefer it