Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

parsing time zone offset with second fails #772

Open
palindrom615 opened this issue Jul 24, 2019 · 5 comments
Open

parsing time zone offset with second fails #772

palindrom615 opened this issue Jul 24, 2019 · 5 comments
Labels

Comments

@palindrom615
Copy link

palindrom615 commented Jul 24, 2019

moment("1899-06-28T23:27:52.000+08:27:52") // invalid date!

Above code results Invalid Date because moment cannot parse timezone offset with the second part.

Though the format is not standard, it is valid Korean standard time before GMT is adopted in Korea on April 1st, 1908. (see this: https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%ED%95%9C%EA%B5%AD_%ED%91%9C%EC%A4%80%EC%8B%9C) Can this case be considered? This bug affects business logic on my work.

@saschanaz
Copy link

The document only says it was +08:28, not +08:27:52 though...

@palindrom615
Copy link
Author

@saschanaz ,

The document only says it was +08:28, not +08:27:52 though...

Yeah, Wikipedia does not mention about the second unit of offset. The premodern time standard is quite an ambiguous problem, but implementations like java ZonedDateTime are designed with later one:
1-934-0f55c3

@saschanaz
Copy link

The Intl implementation in Firefox also generates +08:27:52:

> Intl.DateTimeFormat("default", { timeZone: "Asia/Seoul", timeZoneName: "long" }).format(new Date("1900-01-01T00:00:00"))
"1/1/1900, GMT+08:27:52"

@Hoto-Cocoa
Copy link

According Wikipedia's Time in North Korea Document, "Hanyang (Seoul) which was calculated to be UTC+08:27:52[Ref: A Bridge between Conceptual Frameworks: Sciences, Society and Technology Studies edited by Raffaele Pisano]. In 1442".

image

@ellenaua ellenaua added the bug label Sep 7, 2019
@ichernev
Copy link
Contributor

Fair point, but this is a bug in moment, not moment-timezone. I'll leave it here for now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants