You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First, in embedding, if embeddings are split by categorical and numerical, then this really means you only embed the indicated things. If the embeddings aren't split, then NUMERICAL_ONLY and CATEGORICAL_AND_NUMERICAL are equivalent at the input layer, as there is no way to not embed the categorical data alongside the numerical. In the joint case, CATEGORICAL ONLY gives all values a value of 1, which is odd.
Then, at generation time, it indicates what is generated / predicted in each given layer of the dep graph.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This has two disparate impacts.
First, in embedding, if embeddings are split by categorical and numerical, then this really means you only embed the indicated things. If the embeddings aren't split, then NUMERICAL_ONLY and CATEGORICAL_AND_NUMERICAL are equivalent at the input layer, as there is no way to not embed the categorical data alongside the numerical. In the joint case, CATEGORICAL ONLY gives all values a value of 1, which is odd.
Then, at generation time, it indicates what is generated / predicted in each given layer of the dep graph.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: