You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As an engineering team designing cloud architectures, I need to predict and analyze the cost impact of infrastructure design decisions early in the development lifecycle in order to ensure cost-efficient designs, align with FinOps practices, and avoid unexpected cloud run costs..
Problem Statement
Cloud infrastructure run cost estimation is a critical aspect of modern cloud adoption strategies. The dynamic nature of architectures, combined with the complexity of cloud providers' pricing models, often leads to unexpectedly high costs. Despite the practice of estimating run costs being adopted as early as 2019, the accelerating pace of cloud adoption and the rise of FinOps practices make it essential to revisit this as an architecture fitness function.
While commercial platforms help business units and finance organizations understand costs, engineers making design decisions often lack accessible tools to predict the cost implications of their architectural choices. This gap can lead to overspending and reactive cost management practices.
💎 Solution
I propose creating a tool similar to Infracost or Azure Cost Estimator and integrating them into the FinOps Toolkit or integrating existing tools into the FinOps Toolkit, to help engineering teams:
Predict Run Costs Early:
Automate the prediction of infrastructure run costs based on architectural decisions and Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) definitions.
Provide real-time cost estimates during the design and development lifecycle.
Integrate with CI/CD Pipelines:
Enable cost estimation as part of the Continuous Deployment process to provide actionable feedback during code changes.
Automatically trigger cost-impact analyses when IaC configurations are modified.
Support Usage Projections:
Include inputs for usage levels to combine architectural decisions with expected consumption patterns for accurate predictions.
Enable Early and Frequent Feedback:
Provide immediate feedback when costs deviate from expected levels, enabling teams to reassess and optimize architecture in real-time.
📋 Tasks
The content you are editing has changed. Please copy your edits and refresh the page.
📝 Scenario
As an engineering team designing cloud architectures, I need to predict and analyze the cost impact of infrastructure design decisions early in the development lifecycle in order to ensure cost-efficient designs, align with FinOps practices, and avoid unexpected cloud run costs..
Problem Statement
Cloud infrastructure run cost estimation is a critical aspect of modern cloud adoption strategies. The dynamic nature of architectures, combined with the complexity of cloud providers' pricing models, often leads to unexpectedly high costs. Despite the practice of estimating run costs being adopted as early as 2019, the accelerating pace of cloud adoption and the rise of FinOps practices make it essential to revisit this as an architecture fitness function.
While commercial platforms help business units and finance organizations understand costs, engineers making design decisions often lack accessible tools to predict the cost implications of their architectural choices. This gap can lead to overspending and reactive cost management practices.
💎 Solution
I propose creating a tool similar to Infracost or Azure Cost Estimator and integrating them into the FinOps Toolkit or integrating existing tools into the FinOps Toolkit, to help engineering teams:
Predict Run Costs Early:
Automate the prediction of infrastructure run costs based on architectural decisions and Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) definitions.
Provide real-time cost estimates during the design and development lifecycle.
Integrate with CI/CD Pipelines:
Enable cost estimation as part of the Continuous Deployment process to provide actionable feedback during code changes.
Automatically trigger cost-impact analyses when IaC configurations are modified.
Support Usage Projections:
Include inputs for usage levels to combine architectural decisions with expected consumption patterns for accurate predictions.
Enable Early and Frequent Feedback:
Provide immediate feedback when costs deviate from expected levels, enabling teams to reassess and optimize architecture in real-time.
📋 Tasks
Required tasks
Stretch goals
🙋♀️ Ask for the community
We could use your help:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: