-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 198
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Any ideas why the catchment delineated has holes? How can I filled the holes? #224
Comments
Greetings. When running resolve_flats(..., eps=1e-7) |
Thanks so much for your quick response! This solved one of my two DEM problems. The second DEM still has one hole (but not two, I take that as a partial success). I wonder how low the epsilon value can be. I tried |
@Eric-Jenkins : Could be a good test case to look at. @staceyzhang-cbcl : Are you able to send the DEM? |
I tried. But the file is too large to upload. It's 125MB after compression. |
OK, I uploaded it to my google drive. The pour point is 576410.1845, 5048888.3975. |
I was testing the functions with two DEM files. Both catchments I delineated with a randomly picked pour point had holes in them where I dont think there should be. How do I eliminate them? Did I do something wrong?
For the first DEM, I filled pits, depressions and resolved flats. The first two was good, with
assert not depressions.any()/pits.any()
returning nothing. But the flats seemed not resolved. Could it be the reason?Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: