2022-01-17 weekly planning #979
Replies: 12 comments 9 replies
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Backend updateCompleted
Current priorities
@dmos62 @mathemancer @silentninja Please comment below with thoughts/concerns. If any of you have too many issues assigned, please unassign yourself from any you haven't started yet so someone else can take them. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Design updateCompleted
Current priorities
@ghislaineguerin @ppii775 Please comment below with thoughts/concerns |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Product updateCompleted
Current priorities
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Comms Assignee schedule
InstructionsYou can also find the schedule and instructions for the Comms Assignee on the wiki page. Please feel free to update the wiki page if you think of anything useful during your shift. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have been predominantly focused on the filtering refactor and have not been tracking this spec's development as closely as I'd like. That said, I'm pretty happy with the current state of the views product spec.
Suggested a more generalized approach to how we approach filtering. Our iterations seemed to be pointing that way. Went well.
Continuing feedback-iteration loop on the filtering refactor.
I'll be waiting on feedback from time to time. I'm not worried, since feedback last week was very quick, and I've a backlog of tasks for when I'm blocked. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Brent's check-in
I think the format works well. I'll add more details in that spec discussion.
Pretty well. I got a few smallish PRs in, and merged some PRs for others. Overall, I think the smaller issue strategy is working for me at the moment.
Anticipating filtering being complete (or at least the major structural changes being outlined) soon, I'm getting back into grouping. For the moment, just setting up some SQL utils that will do some calculations to define numeric ranges. I'll also work on the money type(s).
Just the oft-mentioned dependency between filtering and grouping. Will coordinate with @dmos62 on it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Pavish's check-in
I think it's pretty good. I'll add more thoughts on the discussion.
The form builder PR is merged and I reviewed some open PRs. I had some ambitious goals last week inorder to get the data types milestone on the frontend ready by the end of Jan, but didn't manage to meet most of them. Work is progressing though.
None |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Ghislaine's check-in
I discussed some of it w @kgodey. I will add more thoughts to the discussion. It makes sense that we are revising the spec as design exploration uncovered similar issues w the original one.
Although very focused on research and getting some prototype changes in for implementing design for Views, it went well.
Update spec process section on wiki mathesar-wiki#18
None |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have been busy with the error handling PR and haven't fully reviewed it yet, but it looks good and well thought of
I was able to finish off error handling for most cases and get some reviews and discussions done.
Focus on splitting the error handling and new error structure commits into individual PR.
None |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Sean's check in
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I like the idea of product specs, it keeps all the information related to a feature in one place and it's easier to think about the feature as a whole (hopefully also easier to review). That way, people also don't have to review individual GitHub issues.
It went well, it's nice to make some progress on figuring out Views.
It would be great to get a speedy review of the product spec from the remaining reviewers, if I need to do any rethinking of it, it could affect a lot of other work. @dmos62 @ghislaineguerin @mathemancer @pavish @silentninja. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
About
At the start of each week, we start a discussion covering Mathesar's progress, team member check ins, and general updates. Everyone is welcome to add a new topic to discuss or to comment on existing topics.
Discussion topics
Weekly check-in
@centerofci/mathesar-core please post your weekly check-in as a top-level response and edit the discussion topics above to add your check-in as a topic. Others are also welcome to respond.
Prompts:
If you'd like to add anything else to your check-in that's not related to the prompts, feel free to do so.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions