-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Forkable Chat Mode Feedback | 分支对话功能反馈 #4797
Comments
cool! |
非常实用的一个功能! |
A very practical function! |
基于类似于 ChatGPT 这样的消息编辑来进行分支对话似乎更好 好处: 坏处: 如果能将现有的方案跟 ChatGPT 相结合就好啦 Area.mp4 |
It seems better to have branched conversations based on message editing like ChatGPT benefit:
harm:
It would be great if we could combine existing solutions with ChatGPT Area.mp4 |
基于消息编辑做分支会违背我们的基础设定(任何之前的上下文都可以自由修改和编辑),这个并不合理。 更合适的方式是针对「重新生成」这个按钮,做分支切换。而要达成这一步,需要在数据结构上新增一种 message group ,来承载同一个消息的多次生成结果。 有了message group 这个概念后,chatgpt 这种分支形式就可以兼容上,而且像多模型的比对也能比较容易地实现出来。 |
Branching based on message editing would violate our basic settings (any previous context can be freely modified and edited), which is unreasonable. A more appropriate way is to switch branches by targeting the "Regenerate" button. To achieve this step, a new message group needs to be added to the data structure to carry multiple generation results of the same message. With the concept of message group, branch forms such as chatgpt can be compatible, and comparisons of multiple models can also be implemented relatively easily. |
@SpeedupMaster 只会针对激活的展示,我感觉应该还好吧?你会出现一个 topic 开出十几个子话题的场景吗? |
@SpeedupMaster will only target activated displays. I think it should be fine, right? Will you have a scenario where a topic opens more than a dozen sub-topics? |
那应该还好,一般也不会开到那么多的子话题 |
That should be fine, and usually there won’t be so many sub-topics. |
新建话题分支后最后一条对话能否支持重新生成结果呢,主要用于对于同一个问题切换不同的大模型回答 |
Can the last conversation after creating a new topic branch support regeneration of results? It is mainly used to switch between different large model answers to the same question. |
是否可以支持在分支中选择其他模型 |
Is it possible to support selecting other models in a branch |
@jorben @Liangpi000 大模型对比回答的场景,会专门提供另外一个能力来满足 |
@jorben @Liangpi000 In the scenario of large model comparison and answer, another capability will be specially provided to satisfy |
非常期待 |
Very much looking forward to it |
目前我很喜欢分支功能,我可以对同一个话题,通过分支尝试不同的可能性。 |
At the moment I really like the branching feature, I can branch out and try out different possibilities on the same topic. |
你的这个诉求是希望支持无限子分支吗?还是单纯只是希望有一个复制子话题成为主话题的功能? |
Is your request to support infinite sub-branches? Or do you simply want to have a function that copies the sub-topic to become the main topic? |
我倾向于复制子话题成为主话题。无限子分支也可以解决问题,但是我担心会越来越臃肿,管理起来反而更麻烦。 |
I tend to copy subtopics to become the main topic. Unlimited sub-branches can also solve the problem, but I worry that it will become more and more bloated and more troublesome to manage. |
支持从主话题进行无限分枝的功能。理由:
|
Supports unlimited branching from the main topic. reason:
|
使用下来分屏子分支的体验感不是太好,在子分支中很多功能缺失,并且画面占比缩的有点小,目前来看ChatGPT那套交互确实是最优雅的 |
The experience of using the split-screen sub-branch is not very good. Many functions are missing in the sub-branch, and the screen ratio is a bit smaller. Currently, ChatGPT’s set of interactions is indeed the most elegant. |
我不认同,我强烈反对ChatGPT那套。 |
I don’t agree, and I strongly oppose ChatGPT. |
能否展开聊聊你的使用场景? 你觉得缺失了什么功能 |
Can you expand on your usage scenarios? |
开始没有注意到右上方的切换主子话题按钮,默认子话题界面没有菜单栏上的相关功能,功能上是没什么问题,体验上有点割裂感,频繁生成分支对话的场景下没有ChatGPT那套交互丝滑 |
At first I didn’t notice the button to switch main and sub-topics on the upper right. The default sub-topic interface does not have related functions on the menu bar. There is no problem with the function, but the experience is a bit fragmented. In scenarios where branch conversations are frequently generated, there is no smooth interaction like ChatGPT. |
子话题里面就不允许再创建分支了是吗?这样体验不是很好。 |
It is not allowed to create branches in sub-topics, right? This experience is not very good. |
这个暂时没做,但是可以支持上的。 |
This has not been done yet, but it can be supported. |
嗯嗯,加油,这个真的很重要。 |
Well, come on, this is really important. |
flowith那种二维白布的页面弄分支感觉体验更好,有可能在 lobechat 中实现一个类似的吗? 左侧侧边栏新增一个全新的入口 |
The flowith kind of two-dimensional white cloth page makes branching feel better. Is it possible to implement a similar one in lobechat? A new entrance has been added to the left sidebar |
后续会做一个画布的预览形式,但不会放在左边。可以小小期待下最终的样子😄 |
A preview of the canvas will be made later, but it will not be placed on the left. You can look forward to the final look😄 |
如果可以的话还是麻烦加一下无限分支的能力,写文档经常要多次生成看哪个分支回答的比较好,然后沿用该子分支继续,这样递归下去。 |
If possible, please add the ability to have unlimited branches. When writing documents, you often need to generate them multiple times to see which branch answers better, and then continue using that sub-branch, and so on recursively. |
@xtherk 嗯近期会加上去的 |
@xtherk Well, it will be added in the near future. |
感谢您的付出!!! |
Thank you for your efforts! ! ! |
LobeChat v1.34.0 has introduced a crucial new feature: branching conversations, allowing us to infinitely expand the depth and direction of our dialogues. However, as this is an innovative exploration for us, there may be some edge cases during the initial release period (within the first month). We encourage everyone to try it out and provide feedback, as we aim to make this feature a core part of the LobeChat product!
LobeChat v1.34.0 引入了一项非常关键的对话特性:分支对话,从此我们便具备了无限拓展对话深度和对话方向的可能性。但由于该功能是我们的一项创新性探索,可能在发布初期(1个月内)存在边缘的 edge case,欢迎大家体验反馈,我们会及时修复。期待把这个功能打造为 LobeChat 产品的一项核心特性!
Forkable.Chat.mp4
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: