Determine BIDS-friendly naming scheme for Webknossos datasets with multiple imaging layers

[kabilar]

Description

We are working towards naming all assets on the LINC Data Platform according to the BIDS specification. Webknossos datasets will consist of several assets from the LINC Data Platform as imaging/color layers. Let's aim to name these Webknossos datasets according to the BIDS specification (or as close as possible).

Goals

• Determine a standard way to name these Webknossos datasets with multiple imaging layers.
• Document this naming scheme on the LINC docs.

Thank you.

[jingjingwu1225]

Hi @kabilar, we just discussed and agreed on keeping the same name as on lincbrain.org, after we delete/archive duplicated datasets on webknossos, so there is one-to-one correspondence between datasets on lincbrain and webknossos and no need to add more labels onto it.

[kabilar]

Thanks @jingjingwu1225. Sounds great. Will we be creating Webknossos datasets that are comprised of a histology image plus the previously generated annotations from Vaanathi's work that are now in the Zarr format?

[jingjingwu1225]

Hi @kabilar, thanks for the reminder. Yes, after we got the updated groundtruth annotations from Vaanathi's work I'll upload them to lincbrain and add both datasets itself and masks to webknossos in one dataset, and delete the current one. The annotations will be saved separately with the dataset but added as layers in webknossos.

[kabilar]

Thanks @jingjingwu1225. How would you name these Webknossos datasets with multiple layers? I presume that this would be a case where this is not a 1-1 mapping between the naming on lincbrain.org and on webknossos.lincbrain.org.