-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Feature Request] Support for new commercial Roms 3.1.4, 3.2, 3.2.1 #567
Comments
Does even WinUAE accept them, since they don't appear to be in the known ROM list..? And how are they supposed to be named in "WHDLoad" style ( And I don't have the way of testing those anyway, so maybe just use Model preset block being for example with
But I guess that should be changed at some point to also do append like the global one, which will just overwrite the ones that are actually changed.. |
Thanks for your reply. I was able to do a quick test yesterday and I have used the approach via |
FS-UAE uses pretty much the same known ROM list as WinUAE, but those won't prevent using custom ones. The problem here is how the custom ones are supposed to be allowed to be selectable in the core option menu, since either
And since Kickstarts are currently placed in global |
Okeydokey, with the latest change you only need to define Edit: Aaargh, it still gets replaced, whoops. |
Thanks @sonninnos , this will simplify things for me. |
Version numbers for the modern kickstarts are 46143 = KS3.1.4 So allowing the following files would maintain the naming convention and allow the new roms to be selectable. kick46143.A500 |
Hi project team,
thank you so much for all the work spent in this great project, as a Amiga fan since the 80s your work means a lot to me!
I would like to request to support the latest available commercial Roms (versions 3.1.4, 3.2 and 3.2.1) in the Emulator setup (definitely as optional).
In my setup I've been using Retroarch frontend to use the PUAE emulator and I don't find a straightforward way to use e.g. ROM 3.2.1 instead of ROM 3.1 because in the core options shown in Retroarch the default model presets and roms are available.
Thanks in advance and keep up the good work!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: