Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

An in-range update of babel-cli is breaking the build 🚨 #74

Open
greenkeeper bot opened this issue Apr 8, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

An in-range update of babel-cli is breaking the build 🚨 #74

greenkeeper bot opened this issue Apr 8, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@greenkeeper
Copy link

greenkeeper bot commented Apr 8, 2017

Version 6.24.1 of babel-cli just got published.

Branch Build failing 🚨
Dependency babel-cli
Current Version 6.24.0
Type devDependency

This version is covered by your current version range and after updating it in your project the build failed.

As babel-cli is “only” a devDependency of this project it might not break production or downstream projects, but “only” your build or test tools – preventing new deploys or publishes.

I recommend you give this issue a high priority. I’m sure you can resolve this 💪


Status Details
  • coverage/coveralls First build on greenkeeper/babel-cli-6.24.1 at 12.808% Details

  • ci/circleci Your tests passed on CircleCI! Details

  • continuous-integration/appveyor/branch AppVeyor build succeeded Details

  • codecov/patch Coverage not affected when comparing fe5bfde...a7c9aba Details

  • codecov/project 12.31% (-0.5%) compared to fe5bfde Details

Not sure how things should work exactly?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and of course you may always ask my humans.


Your Greenkeeper Bot 🌴

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Aug 17, 2017

Version 6.26.0 just got published.

Your tests are still failing with this version. Compare the changes 🚨

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

0 participants