doc: clarify difference between Expr.hasLooseBVars and Expr.hasLooseBVar #6344
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
awaiting-review |
|
I added these based on my own confusion around these similarly named methods, see also the Zulip thread |
github-actions
bot
added
the
toolchain-available
|
Mathlib CI status (docs):
|
nomeata
reviewed
Dec 9, 2024
Co-authored-by: Joachim Breitner <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds docstrings to
Expr.hasLooseBVarsandExpr.hasLooseBVar, to clarify the difference between these functions, and to document that the former traverses the expression, while the latter is constant-time, using cached information.