As a User I want to add single link to my Pocket

[tdziurko]

Each link to article/video at newsletter page should have small icon that allows user to add it to Pocket service.

[tdziurko]

I am on it.

[mgruca]

There was time, when I wanted to implement it, we may even talked about it. If there is a way now (back then I could not find one), I could help / take over this feature.

[tdziurko]

I have tried a bit but without any significant outcome so if you want I can assign this task to you. I can also push an outdated branch with my initial work so you could check it.

[tdziurko]

@mgruca so what is the status? :)

[mgruca]

looking at API ATM. Should be doable, API improved a lot since last time I was there. Assign it to me, will try to work on it after Confitura (let's check if I can still code :))

[mgruca]

erm, jak manager ma zakodować to lepiej zamknąć? ;)

[tdziurko]

Wrong click :)

[tdziurko]

Making it available to take due to inactivity.

[rumid]

I am on it

[rumid]

With basic tweaks it looks like that:
and it saves with jvm-bloggers short uri, so you don't know
what pocket element is about.
I will have to modify official pocket script (https://getpocket.com/publisher/button).
@tdziurko do you have any feedback regarding positioning of the button? Is it clear which button is responsible for which link?
I was considering adding it right after author with css:flex-box, change every second row background - it doesn't look good - or showing button, when mouse is pointing the link, but I haven't check it how to handle it for mobiles 🤔

[tdziurko]

I am a bit afraid how page will look with.... tens of such buttons 🤔

What do you think about:
1a. Changing button to black-white version
1b. Reducing it to only a logo without Pocket part?
2. Showing it only on-hover for each item.
3. Showing it right after the author?

Maybe if we add on-hover next to each link, applying 1a/1b won't be necessary as there will be only one button visible at a time?

For mobile: I have no idea how to handle on-hover so we could ignore this problem for now :)

[rumid]

Makes sense. I will apply 2 and 3 and experiment with 1a/1b