-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 398
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add DataFrames.jl extension #3821
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3821 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 97.90% 97.92% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 44 46 +2
Lines 6022 6077 +55
==========================================
+ Hits 5896 5951 +55
Misses 126 126 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Is this an improvement? I'm not sure. Now: https://jump.dev/JuMP.jl/previews/PR3821/tutorials/linear/multi/ |
We could also have an array with the same syntax as |
julia> DataFrames.combine( | ||
DataFrames.groupby(x, :j), | ||
:value => df_constraint => :value, | ||
) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This call the in-place operations?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't understand the question. It's not in-place. It creates a new DataFrame
Take II of #3441
x-ref #3438
TODOs
See https://jump.dev/JuMP.jl/previews/PR3821/extensions/DataFrames/