-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Mapping cum.g to original dataset #23
Comments
Is this the proper way to replicate the cum.b matrices?
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
We are using LTMLE for an analysis with 4 periods (quarters). We're trying to peep at the inner workings - from my understanding, LTMLE provides propensity scores, allowing us to calculate the joint probabilities for sequences of treatments, such as P(1,1,1,1) and P(0,0,0,0). Our intent is to compare always treated vs never treated with and without balancing with cumulative P(treatment).
We believe cum.g to be the object we are after.
However I don't know how to 'map' this object back to the original dataset. I assume the Nth row corresponds to the Nth row in the original dataset. I also assume that, given that
then
and
I am looking for confirmation on those. Lastly, the columns -- both of the above slices of cum.g have 8 columns, 1 for each A and C node, as per the documentation. But they're labeled V1-V8, and I don't know to which they each correspond.
LTMLE calls:
and so on for all combinations of 1's and 0's
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: