Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about the results of the attack #37

Open
milumilum opened this issue Dec 18, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Question about the results of the attack #37

milumilum opened this issue Dec 18, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@milumilum
Copy link

hi,
when I experimented with the 1000 samples you provided from the AG dataset and the bert model, the results are:
For dataset data/ag: For target model bert: original accuracy: 94.200%, adv accuracy: 29.500%, avg changed rate: 25.076%, num of queries: 481.7
But the adv accuracy in your paper is 11.5%.
I'm not quite sure what led to this result. So did you use the same 1000 examples in your paper?

Thanks.

@jind11
Copy link
Owner

jind11 commented Dec 19, 2020

I am also not sure why there is such a huge change. Did yo use the same BERT model parameters that I provided?

@milumilum
Copy link
Author

Yes, the model parameters and data are all provided by you.All the other attacks are close to the results given in your paper, only this one deviates a lot, so I wonder whether it is due to the data.

@Youoo1
Copy link

Youoo1 commented Oct 20, 2021

Where is the emdding.npz file, please? Or how is it generated?
b9069123768ea397299dc7ed1419901
7a678cd5f2a8398b7980d8aaa9d5aec

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants