Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create encrypted folder wizard: A forward slash is appended to the path of the encrypted folder #38

Open
Zero3 opened this issue May 28, 2016 · 9 comments
Assignees

Comments

@Zero3
Copy link

Zero3 commented May 28, 2016

When creating a new encrypted folder by passing a non-existing path as the first argument, encfs4win displays the path with a trailing forward slash.

For example, with C:\Encrypted as the path to the encrypted folder:

The directory "C:\Encrypted/" does not exist. Should it be created? (y,n)

While forward slashes are valid directory separators under some circumstances on Windows, backslashes are used almost universally. I would thus expect encfs4win to use a backslash in this situation. I have not checked whether encfs4win displays forward slashes in other messages than this one, but I would not be surprised if it did.

@jetwhiz jetwhiz self-assigned this Jun 10, 2016
@jetwhiz
Copy link
Owner

jetwhiz commented Jun 10, 2016

This is mostly a cosmetic issue, since all paths are run though utf8_to_wfn() before being used (which will ensure the path is in the proper format for Windows).

@Zero3
Copy link
Author

Zero3 commented Aug 2, 2016

On a related note, there is an irregularity in which paths that slashes are appended to:

C:\Program Files (x86)\encfs>encfs D:\Enc D:\Dec
The directory "D:\Enc/" does not exist. Should it be created? (y,n) y
The directory "D:\Dec" does not exist. Should it be created? (y,n) y

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented May 4, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix label May 4, 2019
@stale stale bot closed this as completed May 11, 2019
@Zero3
Copy link
Author

Zero3 commented May 13, 2019

Arhhh!! Bugger off, stalebot! Just because nobody posted anything in a while doesn't mean that the bug was automagically fixed...

@jetwhiz Could you help reopen?

@jetwhiz jetwhiz reopened this May 13, 2019
@stale stale bot removed the wontfix label May 13, 2019
@jetwhiz
Copy link
Owner

jetwhiz commented May 13, 2019

Hi @Zero3 -- just reopened, let me know if there are other issues of yours that it closed and should stay open!

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 13, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix label Jul 13, 2019
@jetwhiz jetwhiz removed the wontfix label Jul 13, 2019
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Sep 11, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix label Sep 11, 2019
@Zero3
Copy link
Author

Zero3 commented Sep 11, 2019

@jetwhiz Just a friendly FYI: I don't intend to contribute any more bug reports to encfs4win when they get automatically closed by stalebot, as that is very discouraging.

@stale stale bot removed the wontfix label Sep 11, 2019
@jetwhiz
Copy link
Owner

jetwhiz commented Sep 16, 2019

Sorry about that @Zero3, I forgot to add the enhancement label to the exempt list for stalebot.

I've made it so that enhancement issues can't be marked as stale, and also bumped up the time-to-close to two weeks to give people more time to respond to incorrectly-marked issues.

Stalebot is intended to help keep the issue backlog clean in cases where the issue creator is not responding and the problem has not been able to be confirmed or reproduced.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants