New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[jaeger-v2] Do away with storage.ArchiveFactory #5230
Labels
Comments
4 tasks
I would like to work on this. |
4 tasks
Can I work on this issue? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Per comment https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/pull/5152/files#r1501916983
We need to get rid of
storage.ArchiveFactory
interface because it is conceptually meaningless - archive storage is just a storage that implements SpanStorage interface. It should be the same thing with Factory, just have astorage.Factory
that in context can be interpreted as primary or archive. We unnecessarily bundle these two.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: