Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Versioning CSP Application #29

Open
lucasscarduelli opened this issue Aug 25, 2015 · 5 comments
Open

Versioning CSP Application #29

lucasscarduelli opened this issue Aug 25, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

@lucasscarduelli
Copy link

For CSP applications I do not see the need for versioning export XML files, this because within the application often have files from other formats that would provide greater control if they were versioned for its extension origin.

@adaptun
Copy link
Contributor

adaptun commented Aug 25, 2015

In ideal world classes and routines also can be exported as plain text. This can be probably be done in version 2.0 of this plugin that will break compatibility with existing repositories. Not to mention that version 2.0 will highly unlikely ever come.

@lucasscarduelli
Copy link
Author

Okay, I agree fully, but as that was made today, I'm just having trouble with the versioning of binary files, for example, when I need an image versioning. There is a possibility now change the project so that binary files are versioned in its original format?

@lucasscarduelli
Copy link
Author

Another alternative would be to indicate the settings the way the CSP application and versioning directly to physical folder, and not export Caché.

@lucasscarduelli
Copy link
Author

Any news?

@adaptun
Copy link
Contributor

adaptun commented Nov 12, 2015

What is the problem with binary files? They are exported in standard $system.OBJ.Export base64-XML format.

It has the same problems as export of js in XML-like format. Or cls.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants