We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
follow up of this PR.
If someone wants to use websocket extensions in the future, at least the following supports are needed
Sec-WebSocket-Extensions
WebSocketFrame
WebsocketFrame
In addition to that, the defrag conditions also need to be modified slightly to meet the specifications.
RFC 6455
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
follow up of this PR.
If someone wants to use websocket extensions in the future, at least the following supports are needed
Sec-WebSocket-Extensions
header (currently this header is not explicitly supported)WebSocketFrame
(reserved-bits can be set in anyWebsocketFrame
)In addition to that, the defrag conditions also need to be modified slightly to meet the specifications.
RFC 6455
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: