-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
directionality of the comparison from Deseq2 output #199
Comments
Hi! Oh, good eye. I think this should be
@MarieLataretu @fischer-hub can you confirm that? Because we switched the comparison at some point, I'm not 100% sure. When clarified, we can update the README accordingly to make this clear. Thanks! |
I think this is when we changed this? But from the description in the PR I would understand that a log2FoldChange of -2 for gene A would tell you that this gene is 2-fold downregulated with condition X. The gene A is lower expressed in condition X?
for infected_vs_mock But not sure.. |
@fischer-hub yes! I think you're actually right. But still not 100% w/o checking... I just looked into some recent data I calculated. Pairwise comparison between Here, a gene Now, the question is: is the gene high expressed in The image shows the triplicates belonging to the two conditions So based on that, the README text should be:
Agree? If so, we can update the README accordingly. |
@hoelzer yes, seems right! I'll update the README :) |
Perfect, thx! |
Hello,
Please can I ask about the directionality of the comparison from Deseq2 output. The following text is there but not very clear to me, X_vs_Y does not corelate to condition B and A:
"For each comparison (specified with --deg or, per default, all possible pairwise comparisons in one direction), a new folder X_vs_Y is created. This also describes the direction of the comparison, e.g. the log2FoldChange describes the change of a gene under condition B with respect to the gene under condition A."
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: